Making Data-Driven Decisions at the Contested Edge

Also available on:

Military modernization is usually discussed in platforms — how many tanks, jets and ships, and how quickly they can be procured. Hannah Hunt's argument is that the decisive capability is a different one: whether the data moving between sensors, shooters, software and hardware is integrated well enough for a commander to make a decision and act on it in time. That is the point of the Army's push toward Joint All-Domain Command and Control by 2030, and the reason she frames the kill chain as a data problem rather than a firepower one. An acquisition process built for platforms takes five to ten years to field a capability, which is time the decision does not have.

The gap she describes isn't collection. Senior leaders are pressing for change precisely because the intelligence gathering and the data already gathered point to the need. The problem shows up at the point of decision: a commander asking whether the right assets are available for a mission, whether sensors are positioned where they need to be, has historically had to call and radio around to assemble an answer the data should already be able to give. Her fix is a portfolio of interdependent products rather than isolated tools — closer to a productivity suite, where the underlying data is shared across them and a commander gets one picture instead of a dozen partial answers.

Key takeaways:

• Hybrid cloud is the missing layer. Decisions at the edge depend on a hybrid and multi-cloud footing the Army has recognized it needs and is pushing toward. Hybrid matters because a disconnected unit still has to operate, which means the data and the tooling to act on it must sit locally rather than behind a network link.
• The people who lived the process know which data matters. The talent is already in the ranks — coding in their spare time, or assigned to career fields well below their engineering skill — and their real advantage is having lived the process, so they know where it breaks and which data the decision actually rests on.
• Allied forces are upskilling too. The UK Army and Royal Air Force, the Australians, and NATO more broadly have all looked at upskilling their own active-duty ranks to build software, which makes this a structural shift across defense organizations rather than one service's experiment.